Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 G93SC vs GIGABYTE M34WQC
Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 G93SC (#1, best overall) vs GIGABYTE M34WQC (#5, best budget): in our Ultrawide Gaming Monitors scoring the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 G93SC totals 9.5/10 and the GIGABYTE M34WQC 7.8/10.
We may earn a commission when you buy through our links.
TopsFive comparison scores
Side by side
| Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 G93SC | GIGABYTE M34WQC | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 49" 32:9, 1800R curve | — |
| Resolution | 5120x1440 | 3440x1440 |
| Refresh Rate | 240Hz | 144Hz |
| Panel | QD-OLED | VA |
| Response Time | 0.03ms GtG | 1ms MPRT |
| HDR | DisplayHDR True Black 400 | HDR400 |
| Price | Check price → | Check price → |
How they differ in real use
Built from our ultrawide gaming monitors scoring, each product's published specifications, and verified owner feedback — not hands-on testing.
Both the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 G93SC and the GIGABYTE M34WQC made our Top 5 Ultrawide Gaming Monitors, at #1 (best overall) and #5 (best budget). The most immersive screen here: a 49" 32:9 QD-OLED at 5120x1440 and 240Hz with 0.03ms response, equal to two 27" 1440p monitors side by side and wider than the LG 45GR95QE's 45" 3440x1440 canvas. It is the same panel as the G95SC it replaces in this ranking, minus the smart TV apps and remote, which costs it a little on features but nothing on picture or speed. The trade-offs are a desk footprint of about 1.2 m, OLED burn-in risk and patchy 32:9 support in some games. Budget ultrawide champion with VA contrast at 144Hz. USB-C and KVM switch at $350 make it the entry point for ultrawide gaming.
We score ultrawide gaming monitors on Immersion (30%), Image Quality (25%), Speed (25%), Features (10%) and Value (10%). On that basis the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 G93SC totals 9.5 out of 10 and the GIGABYTE M34WQC 7.8. The widest gap is Image Quality, where the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 G93SC scores 10 against 7 for the GIGABYTE M34WQC: resolution and colors. Speed also separates them: 10 for the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 G93SC versus 7 for the GIGABYTE M34WQC. The GIGABYTE M34WQC claws back ground on Value and Features.
On paper, the specifications that actually differ: Resolution: 5120x1440 on the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 G93SC versus 3440x1440 on the GIGABYTE M34WQC; Refresh Rate: 240Hz on the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 G93SC versus 144Hz on the GIGABYTE M34WQC; Panel: QD-OLED on the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 G93SC versus VA on the GIGABYTE M34WQC; Response Time: 0.03ms GtG on the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 G93SC versus 1ms MPRT on the GIGABYTE M34WQC; HDR: DisplayHDR True Black 400 on the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 G93SC versus HDR400 on the GIGABYTE M34WQC.
Check current pricing at the merchant links below. Owners praise the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 G93SC for 49" QD-OLED 32:9 at 5120x1440 and 240Hz with 0.03ms GtG response; the most common complaint is no smart TV apps or remote: streaming needs a separate device. Owners praise the GIGABYTE M34WQC for 34" 144Hz affordable and VA panel contrast; the most common complaint is VA smearing in dark scenes.
Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 G93SC
- 49" QD-OLED 32:9 at 5120x1440
- 240Hz with 0.03ms GtG response
- DisplayHDR True Black 400 and FreeSync Premium Pro
- 1800R curve with height-adjustable stand
- No smart TV apps or remote: streaming needs a separate device
- About 1.2 m (3 ft 11 in) wide, so it needs a large desk
- Not all games support 32:9
GIGABYTE M34WQC
- 34" 144Hz affordable
- VA panel contrast
- 1500R curve
- USB-C with 65W PD
- VA smearing in dark scenes
- Not OLED blacks
- 144Hz limit
Which should you buy?
The Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 G93SC is the better fit for sim racing/flight sims and productivity + gaming on one screen; it is the higher-scoring pick here, chiefly for Image Quality and Speed. The GIGABYTE M34WQC is the better fit for budget ultrawide gaming and contrast priority, and the stronger choice if Value and Features matter more to you than the overall score. The Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 G93SC is a poor fit for competitive esports; the GIGABYTE M34WQC is a poor fit for fast-paced competitive.
Choose the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 G93SC if
- Sim racing/flight sims
- Productivity + gaming on one screen
- Those replacing dual monitors
Skip it if
- Competitive esports
- Small desks
Choose the GIGABYTE M34WQC if
- Budget ultrawide gaming
- Contrast priority
- Productivity users
Skip it if
- Fast-paced competitive
- OLED seekers
Common questions
Is the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 G93SC better than the GIGABYTE M34WQC?
In our Ultrawide Gaming Monitors ranking the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 G93SC scores higher overall, 9.5 to 7.8, with the biggest advantage in Image Quality. The GIGABYTE M34WQC is stronger on Value and Features, so it is the better pick if those matter most to you.
What is the main difference between the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 G93SC and the GIGABYTE M34WQC?
The headline spec difference is Resolution: 5120x1440 on the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 G93SC versus 3440x1440 on the GIGABYTE M34WQC. In use, the gap that matters most is Image Quality (10 vs 7 in our scoring): resolution and colors.