Samsung Galaxy A37 5G vs Motorola Moto G Stylus 2025
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G (#2) vs Motorola Moto G Stylus 2025 (#4, best value): in our Budget Smartphones scoring the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G totals 8.4/10 and the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2025 7.4/10.
We may earn a commission when you buy through our links.
TopsFive comparison scores
Side by side
| Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | Motorola Moto G Stylus 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 120Hz, 1,900 nits peak | 6.9" P-OLED, 2400x1080, 120Hz |
| Processor | Exynos 1480 (4nm) | Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 |
| RAM | 6GB/8GB | 8GB |
| Storage | 128GB/256GB | 256GB |
| Battery | 5,000mAh, 45W charging | 5,000mAh, 68W charging |
| Weight | 196g | 190g |
| Price | Check price → | Check price → |
How they differ in real use
Built from our budget smartphones scoring, each product's published specifications, and verified owner feedback — not hands-on testing.
Both the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G and the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2025 made our Top 5 Budget Smartphones, at #2 and #4 (best value). Samsung's 2026 mid-ranger, sold by Amazon.com itself: a 6.7" 120Hz Super AMOLED rated for 1,900 nits peak, Gorilla Glass Victus+ front and back, IP68, 45W wired charging and 6 years of OS and security updates. It lasted 29 hours 10 minutes in Engadget's video rundown, slightly longer than the Pixel 10a's 28 hours, but Engadget still preferred the Pixel's image quality and AI features, and Google promises 7 years of updates to Samsung's 6, which keeps the A37 in second. It ranks above the Galaxy A36 because its Exynos 1480 posts roughly 15% higher published Geekbench 6 scores (about 1,150 single-core and 3,450 multi-core versus 1,000 and 2,900), it upgrades to IP68, and it ran about two hours longer in Tech Advisor's PCMark battery test. Built-in stylus rare at any price, 256GB storage (double everything else here), IP68 + MIL-STD-810H durability, and 68W fast charging at $349.99 on Amazon. The 2026 model exists but costs $499 and hasn't reached Amazon; this one remains the value play.
We score budget smartphones on Value (30%), Camera Quality (25%), Performance (20%), Software Support (15%) and Battery Life (10%). On that basis the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G totals 8.4 out of 10 and the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2025 7.4. The widest gap is Software Support, where the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G scores 9.5 against 6 for the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2025: updates. Camera Quality also separates them: 7.5 for the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G versus 6 for the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2025. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 2025 claws back ground on Value.
On paper, the specifications that actually differ: Display: 6.7" Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 120Hz, 1,900 nits peak on the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G versus 6.9" P-OLED, 2400x1080, 120Hz on the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2025; Processor: Exynos 1480 (4nm) on the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G versus Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 on the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2025; RAM: 6GB/8GB on the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G versus 8GB on the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2025; Storage: 128GB/256GB on the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G versus 256GB on the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2025; Battery: 5,000mAh, 45W charging on the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G versus 5,000mAh, 68W charging on the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2025; Weight: 196g on the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G versus 190g on the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2025.
Check current pricing at the merchant links below. Owners praise the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G for 6 years of OS and security updates and IP68 dust and water resistance, up from the Galaxy A36's IP67; the most common complaint is exynos 1480 is the 2024 Galaxy A55's chip, and Tech Advisor saw lag when switching apps. Owners praise the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2025 for built-in stylus rare at price and 256GB storage; the most common complaint is slower processor.
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
- 6 years of OS and security updates
- IP68 dust and water resistance, up from the Galaxy A36's IP67
- Lasted 29 hours 10 minutes in Engadget's video rundown and 13 hours 36 minutes in Tech Advisor's PCMark battery test, about two hours more than the A36
- 45W wired charging, faster than the Pixel 10a's 30W
- Exynos 1480 is the 2024 Galaxy A55's chip, and Tech Advisor saw lag when switching apps
- Plastic frame, where the pricier Galaxy A57 uses aluminum
- Weak 8MP ultrawide and 5MP macro cameras, with no telephoto
Motorola Moto G Stylus 2025
- Built-in stylus rare at price
- 256GB storage
- IP68 + military durability
- 68W fast charging
- Slower processor
- Basic cameras
- Limited software updates
Which should you buy?
The Samsung Galaxy A37 5G is the better fit for samsung ecosystem users on a budget and buyers who want IP68 and long battery life; it is the higher-scoring pick here, chiefly for Software Support and Camera Quality. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 2025 is the better fit for budget note-takers and stylus productivity, and the stronger choice if Value matters more to you than the overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A37 5G is a poor fit for heavy gamers and multitaskers; the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2025 is a poor fit for performance gaming.
Choose the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G if
- Samsung ecosystem users on a budget
- Buyers who want IP68 and long battery life
- Long-term phone keepers
Skip it if
- Heavy gamers and multitaskers
- MicroSD expansion needs
Choose the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2025 if
- Budget note-takers
- Stylus productivity
- Rugged phone needs
Skip it if
- Performance gaming
- Camera enthusiasts
Common questions
Is the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2025?
In our Budget Smartphones ranking the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G scores higher overall, 8.4 to 7.4, with the biggest advantage in Software Support. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 2025 is stronger on Value, so it is the better pick if that matters most to you.
What is the main difference between the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G and the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2025?
The headline spec difference is Display: 6.7" Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 120Hz, 1,900 nits peak on the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G versus 6.9" P-OLED, 2400x1080, 120Hz on the Motorola Moto G Stylus 2025. In use, the gap that matters most is Software Support (9.5 vs 6 in our scoring): updates.

