Mammotion LUBA mini 2 AWD 1500H vs Worx Landroid S WR165

How they differ in real use

Built from our robot lawn mowers small yards scoring, each product's published specifications, and verified owner feedback — not hands-on testing.

Both the Mammotion LUBA mini 2 AWD 1500H and the Worx Landroid S WR165 made our Top 5 Robot Lawn Mowers for Small Yards, at #4 (best premium) and #5. The most capable robot here by a wide margin, and Mammotion's current successor to the LUBA mini AWD: all-wheel drive is rated for 80% slopes, 360-degree LiDAR plus dual cameras map the lawn wire-free without an RTK antenna (so tree cover is not a problem), and a dedicated edge disc, 4G GPS tracking, and 20-zone mapping are all built in. It ranks fourth specifically for the small, flat-yard buyer this list serves: it is the priciest option, its 0.37-acre rating is more than a compact lawn needs, and its terrain hardware is wasted on level ground. If your small yard is genuinely hilly, uneven, or shaded, it is the clear pick despite the rank. A solid boundary-wire choice whose strongest argument is ecosystem fit: its 20V Power Share battery is shared across the entire Worx tool lineup, so existing Worx owners buy into batteries they already have. It lands last because it needs a perimeter wire, has no camera obstacle avoidance, and reviewers report it can get stuck on uneven ground. That's fine for a clear, simple lawn, but outclassed by the wire-free and quieter picks above it.

We score robot lawn mowers for small yards on Setup & Navigation (25%), Cut Quality & Coverage (20%), Smart Features & Obstacle Handling (20%), Quiet Operation (10%) and Value (25%). On that basis the Mammotion LUBA mini 2 AWD 1500H totals 7.9 out of 10 and the Worx Landroid S WR165 6.9. The widest gap is Smart Features & Obstacle Handling, where the Mammotion LUBA mini 2 AWD 1500H scores 9.6 against 6.2 for the Worx Landroid S WR165: obstacle avoidance, slope capability, app control, zones, and anti-theft. Setup & Navigation also separates them: 8.8 for the Mammotion LUBA mini 2 AWD 1500H versus 6.4 for the Worx Landroid S WR165. The Worx Landroid S WR165 claws back ground on Value and Quiet Operation.

On paper, the specifications that actually differ: Coverage Area: Up to 0.37 acre (~16,000 sq ft) on the Mammotion LUBA mini 2 AWD 1500H versus Up to 1/8 acre (5,445 sq ft) on the Worx Landroid S WR165; Navigation: 360° LiDAR + dual-camera AI Vision, wire-free (no RTK antenna) on the Mammotion LUBA mini 2 AWD 1500H versus Boundary wire + AIA algorithm on the Worx Landroid S WR165; Perimeter Wire: Not required on the Mammotion LUBA mini 2 AWD 1500H versus Required (included) on the Worx Landroid S WR165; Max Slope: 80% (38.6°) in-zone; ~40% at edges (AWD) on the Mammotion LUBA mini 2 AWD 1500H versus 20° (35%) on the Worx Landroid S WR165; Cutting Width: 7.9 in main disc + 4.7 in edge disc on the Mammotion LUBA mini 2 AWD 1500H versus 7 in on the Worx Landroid S WR165; Cutting Height: 2.2–4.0 in (High Version) on the Mammotion LUBA mini 2 AWD 1500H versus 1.2–2.4 in on the Worx Landroid S WR165.

Check current pricing at the merchant links below. Owners praise the Mammotion LUBA mini 2 AWD 1500H for all-wheel drive rated for 80% (38.6°) slopes in the mowing area, far beyond any other pick here and 360° LiDAR + dual-camera AI vision: no boundary wire, no RTK antenna, and reliable positioning under trees; the most common complaint is the most expensive mower on this list, with more capacity (0.37 acre) than a small lawn needs. Owners praise the Worx Landroid S WR165 for 20V Power Share battery works across the whole Worx tool lineup and patented AIA algorithm navigates narrow passages; the most common complaint is boundary wire required, no wire-free setup option.