Elgato 4K X vs AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1
Elgato 4K X (#1, best overall) vs AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1 (#3): in our Capture Cards scoring the Elgato 4K X totals 9.4/10 and the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1 8.8/10, the Elgato 4K X leading on Compatibility. At $200 versus $229, the Elgato 4K X costs $29 less.
We may earn a commission when you buy through our links. Prices and availability shown are accurate as of Apr 1, 2026 and are subject to change; the merchant's price at purchase applies.
TopsFive comparison scores
Side by side
| Elgato 4K X | AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $200 | $229 |
| Max Capture | 4K @ 144fps | 4K @ 144fps / 4K60 standard |
| Max Passthrough | 4K @ 144fps HDR10 | 4K @ 144fps HDR/VRR |
| Connection | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type-C) | PCIe Gen 3 x4 |
| HDMI | 2.1 | 2.1 (in + out) |
| VRR | Yes | — |
| Weight | 91g | 150g |
| Audio | — | 5.1 multi-channel |
How they differ in real use
Built from our capture cards scoring, each product's published specifications, and verified owner feedback — not hands-on testing.
Both the Elgato 4K X and the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1 made our Top 5 Capture Cards, at #1 (best overall) and #3. The only external capture card with true 4K144 HDR10 capture and passthrough via HDMI 2.1. Handles the full output of PS5 Pro and Xbox Series X without compromise. VRR passthrough, USB 3.2 Gen 2, and the Elgato software ecosystem make it the undisputed best capture card available. The best internal capture card for dual-PC setups. Its PCIe Gen 3 x4 connection eliminates USB bandwidth concerns entirely, with HDMI 2.1 passthrough up to 4K144 HDR/VRR. The lowest latency option for professional streaming configurations.
We score capture cards on Capture Quality (35%), Passthrough (25%), Compatibility (20%), Build Quality (10%) and Value (10%). On that basis the Elgato 4K X totals 9.4 out of 10 and the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1 8.8. The widest gap is Compatibility, where the Elgato 4K X scores 9 against 6 for the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1 — software and platform.
On paper, the specifications that actually differ: Max Capture — 4K @ 144fps on the Elgato 4K X versus 4K @ 144fps / 4K60 standard on the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1; Max Passthrough — 4K @ 144fps HDR10 on the Elgato 4K X versus 4K @ 144fps HDR/VRR on the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1; Connection — USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type-C) on the Elgato 4K X versus PCIe Gen 3 x4 on the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1; HDMI — 2.1 on the Elgato 4K X versus 2.1 (in + out) on the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1; Weight — 91g on the Elgato 4K X versus 150g on the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1.
Pricing as of April 1, 2026: $200 for the Elgato 4K X and $229 for the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1, a $29 difference in the Elgato 4K X's favor. Owners praise the Elgato 4K X for 4K144 HDR10 capture and passthrough via HDMI 2.1 and VRR and ALLM passthrough for tear-free gaming; the most common complaint is premium price at $249. Owners praise the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1 for pCIe connection eliminates USB bandwidth bottleneck and 4K144 HDR/VRR passthrough with HDMI 2.1; the most common complaint is requires desktop PC with PCIe x4 slot.
Elgato 4K X
- 4K144 HDR10 capture and passthrough via HDMI 2.1
- VRR and ALLM passthrough for tear-free gaming
- Works with PC, Mac, and iPad
- Ultra-low latency with Instant Gameview
- Premium price at $249
- Requires USB 3.2 Gen 2 for full performance
- No standalone recording to SD card
AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1
- PCIe connection eliminates USB bandwidth bottleneck
- 4K144 HDR/VRR passthrough with HDMI 2.1
- 5.1 surround sound capture
- Ultrawide resolution support
- Requires desktop PC with PCIe x4 slot
- Not portable — internal only
- Windows only (no macOS)
Which should you buy?
The Elgato 4K X is the better fit for next-gen 4K144 console streamers and PS5 Pro and Xbox Series X content creators — it is the higher-scoring pick here, chiefly for Compatibility. The AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1 is the better fit for dual-PC streaming setups and professional streamers wanting lowest latency. Since the Elgato 4K X is both the higher scorer and $29 cheaper, the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1 only makes sense for dual-PC streaming setups. The Elgato 4K X is a poor fit for budget-conscious beginners; the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1 is a poor fit for laptop users.
Choose the Elgato 4K X if
- Next-gen 4K144 console streamers
- PS5 Pro and Xbox Series X content creators
- High-refresh competitive gaming capture
Skip it if
- Budget-conscious beginners
- Those without USB 3.2 Gen 2
Choose the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1 if
- Dual-PC streaming setups
- Professional streamers wanting lowest latency
- Desktop users who prefer internal cards
Skip it if
- Laptop users
- macOS users
Common questions
Is the Elgato 4K X better than the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1?
In our Capture Cards ranking the Elgato 4K X scores higher overall, 9.4 to 8.8, with the biggest advantage in Compatibility. The AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1 does not out-score it on any criterion we weigh.
How much more does the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1 cost than the Elgato 4K X?
$29 more as of April 1, 2026: $229 for the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1 against $200 for the Elgato 4K X. Prices move, so the merchant page shows the current figure.
What is the main difference between the Elgato 4K X and the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1?
The headline spec difference is Max Capture: 4K @ 144fps on the Elgato 4K X versus 4K @ 144fps / 4K60 standard on the AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K 2.1. In use, the gap that matters most is Compatibility (9 vs 6 in our scoring): software and platform.